YakimaCorruption.com
18 August 2002
Your goal is to learn the mechanism of how a human mind can be left with no access to the reasoning process within it, so you do not become a victim of that mechanism.
You may prefer to reach that goal so that your mind does not end up like the government officials, lawyers and judges, who in turn teach their children to thus never learn how they can utilize their mind to actually solve problems. You do not want to end up like those victims of their own power, or their children, for obvious reasons that their minds cannot recognize even if they read what follows.
A court of law was originally designed for two parties to bring forward every possible item of data they perceive as related to a manifested contradiction or problem, in a forum where no intimidation, force, haste or unquestioned attempt to deceive, could prevent a full consideration and analysis of the data, to ascertain a logical conclusion that does not create any new contradiction to the data or to the applicable law.
Read that again, no contradiction to the data or the applicable law.
If your conclusion contains no contradiction to the known data, you are correct to the extent of your knowledge. If a contradiction remains in place, you cannot possibly be correct. Your conclusion is therein contradicted.
If you willfully ignore some of the data, your conclusion cannot possibly be correct, by definition, because you did not synthesize some of the data, even if a later analysis with the additional data then shows that you would have been correct if you considered the data.
The forum of the court therefore created the common law, because pure reasoning by the human mind was the only game at play, where no form of force, intimidation, threat, haste or unquestioned deceit was available to stop human reasoning short of its most accurate achievement. The results were written as the common law, that is, the highest case law for any specific human action, derived among all such cases, prevailing against the test of time.
But of course, the government boys, with their lawyers and judges, held power and titles, which thus altered their perceptions of the original design of courts and the human mind.
Power corrupts, which is to say, it alters the perceptions of the human mind.
Given information, your mind will make a logical conclusion from the information, that is, until it becomes corrupted by power, and then it will defy the information to always make the conclusion that advances the institutional power of the person so corrupted.
Reasoning ends with a conclusion that contains no contradiction to the known facts. Power concludes with a conclusion that advances power regardless of the contradictions to the known facts. Write that, and compare all institutional conclusions with that.
Power cannot exist in the face of reasoning. Reasoning is created by asking and answering questions. Therefore the government boys methodically sought to subvert each court process, to favor power over reasoning. The first thing they had to do was to prevent the type questions that exposed the otherwise obvious flaw of preventing the right of a person to ask questions.
It was not a conspiracy, and could not be a conspiracy. Humans are not sufficiently intelligent to sustain a conspiracy. Dishonesty is ultimately untenable. It is the creation of a contradiction. The human mind is a contradiction resolution device. The corruption of the courts and law happened over time, with many diverse individuals who never talked to each other. Their only commonality was that they held titles and positions of power.
If you think that titles and power do not universally alter the perceptions of the human mind, with a consistent pattern, among the many available proofs, simply try to get any titled person to renounce their title in public. They do not have to surrender their job or the knowledge their mind holds, but just not respond to their titles, and respond only to their original name. You will obviously fail, and be amused. The power created by titles is the most addicting drug known to the human mind, without a close second. Heroin is not addicting compared to titles and power, nor even remotely as damaging as power. You can do the same exercise with power itself, but that requires a bit more knowledge, and is even more amusing.
Two diverse case examples are presented, showing an illogical commonality that could not occur by any other mechanism, among billions of available examples.
Example 1: An aspect of the case of this website.
Lawyers and judges deal with court cases day after day. It is a boring, repetitious process, not unlike many jobs. They push paper. They learn what to usually expect from each action or item of data. So they decided to use their power to make things more efficient. Humans like to do those things. The efficiency created advantages for the lawyers and judges, primarily increasing the number of cases they could handle per day, thus increasing their income from direct payments or from government budget excuse process explained elsewhere. Their process to create more efficiency was rewarded with more money. Laziness was also rewarded because it is a government arena where jobs are secured by means other than efficiency. Thus the efficiency entrenched and encouraged itself beyond its first manifestation.
But the common law is unique among human phenomena, for the reason explained above. It cannot exist when reasoning is limited.
The efficiency only sacrificed thorough data analysis or reasoning outside the usual cases. The judges and lawyers made the most money off the usual cases, not those at the two ends of the bell curve. So justice was sacrificed only a little, in trade for a lot of money and free time.
But the results exponentially compounded themselves, as is inherent to creating a contradiction and leaving it in place.
Remember, the reason that the original mechanism of court created superior reasoning over the mechanism of force is that haste could not be utilized to eliminate consideration of any data needed or perceived for the human mind's reasoning process.
For example, a proof of innocence may result from a combination of data points. If any one of them was omitted for lack of time or any other excuse, an innocent person may executed, or any other wrong decision made.
After the lawyers and judges therefore started writing the Rules of the Court, for lucrative efficiency, by that corrupted process they added a rule for limine.
If you do not know what a limine is, neither do I, because Judge Robert Hackett adamantly refused to define a limine in its English words, for reason that this example illuminates. The property owner asked that all Latin and legal terms of art be defined with their English language definitions, and those English language definitions used instead of the Latin and legal terms of art.
But power is created by fabricating a series of procedural or rhetorical straw men, such as limines, each creating only a minor little part of the contradiction that therefore becomes a large contradiction when the parts are combined. The process is protected by another contradiction, using the power of office and its ability to intimidate and punish, to not tolerate any questions of that process or the contradictions. If the English language definition of a limine was used, it would expose the questions that revealed the flaws of using a limine as it was used by Hackett and other judges in violation of the common law. Sound reasoning is created by asking questions. Reasoning destroys the use of raw power. Modern court judges function on raw power above law and reasoning, and could not recognize reasoning if you handed them a dictionary. They do not allow questions to be asked of their actions, and therefore train their mind to eventually not recognize any contradictions in their use of power above reasoning.
It is an aside to note a rhetorical straw man routinely used by court judges to evade questions of their unlawful actions. If you ask a judge a question about a contradiction or unlawful action he created, he will routinely respond that he is not allowed to offer legal opinions or advice. That is a rhetorical straw man. So when you therefore state that you are not asking for advice or opinion, but asking that the judge reveal the written law for evidence in court, relating the action or contradiction created, he would logically therefore reveal the law that resolves the contradiction he created, and answers your questions of the law. The common law has already created the resolution to every contradiction found in court process. But the judge's power-damaged mind cannot understand logic or truth. A power-damaged mind becomes angered by the type questions that expose its use of power as a replacement for reasoning, logic or truth. The minds of court judges therefore function on emotion, and simply refuse to answer, or threaten you for daring to ask such a question. The judge will refuse to reveal the law, and simply rest on his substitution of the words, advice and opinion, for your use of the word, law. He trained his mind to substitute words and their meanings when your words revealed a contradiction in his mind. You do not want that to happen to your mind, least you will end up like Judge Robert Hackett and his ilk. If you function on anger or any other emotion for a decision you must then further rely upon, you will create problems for yourself and others. If you substitute unrelated words for the words that define the contradiction at question, to protect your power above your reasoning process, you will end up dying of old age with a mind still as self-confused about all the contradictions around you as are Robert Hackett and his government ilk.
The effect of the City Council lawyer mouthing the rhetorical straw man, limine, and the legalistic jargon of inferior case laws he selected to create the illusion that a limine was the law in this case, while the judge refused to reveal the related law or answer questions, was to define everything the property owner said as, prejudice, and thus not allowed to be said because we certainly do not want a prejudiced jury. The property owner was thus not allowed to present his case, and was left to sit there in the resulting Washington State Superior Kangaroo Court of Judge Robert Hackett.
The word, limine, was used to invoke the word, prejudice, to replace the word, information.
Would you not use the word, information, if that is what was being presented in a court so that a logical conclusion could be derived from the information?
The illogical results of substituting a limine for information are obvious to every thinking human mind. But how could such a phenomenon have been created among human minds which were originally designed to think, but then acquired positions of power?
Omitting the easily identified flaw that created the first power-damaged minds, the original excuse to create the first limine needed a set of words adequate to fool fools. First among said fools, the power-damaged minds of the lawyers and judges needed another excuse to advance their insatiable power with rhetorical illusions that fooled their own minds so they did not have to state the truthful words that they were being dishonest, malicious and denying people their rights. Then they needed some inherently available, uneducated victims of their lack of prior knowledge and their ignorance of the process of asking questions, to create the inferior case laws building the proverbial house of cards that routinely fools fools. Once any case law is established on record, using gullible citizen victims whose rights were thus trammeled by dishonest lawyers and judges, the lawyers and judges simply refer to that case law as the law, and do not mention the superior law, and refuse to answer any questions about the difference.
They substitute the inferior case laws for superior law, in the same manner and for the same reason that they substitute limines for information. The controlling concepts of the power-damaged minds are very simple.
So the excuse they used for condemnation cases creating a limine was found in the common and logical process of the government belatedly offering a property owner a little more money for his property, to avoid the costs of a court battle after first trying to cheat him. At this moment, you may recognize the concept that is categorically beyond the understanding of any victim of a government job. The original flaw was the use of force rather than reasoning, to take private property by condemnation rather than reasoning. Everything after that is flawed. Not one power-damaged mind in the world can understand the otherwise easy process to achieve the public acquisition of private property without any use of force. Now back to the effect of the first sentence of this paragraph.
Because the offer of a little more money is based on a logical preference to avoid the costs of a court battle, the government boys suggested to themselves that the higher offer should not be allowed to be told to the jury because that amount did not constitute the fair market valuation of the property as determined for a willing buyer and willing seller outside a court battle.
That seems logical since the jury must determine the impartial fair market value in a condemnation case. But the property owner might start the argument-based bidding at that higher figure because he would truthfully say that the government was willing to pay at least that amount.
So the lawyers and judges in the back room wrote a new court rule creating a limine to make it a crime for the property owner to mention to the jury the higher figure that the government was offering before the court battle started.
But wait, without the rule, the government lawyer could simply state to the jury that the government had offered the higher price only to avoid the cost of a court battle, not to establish a fair market value. If the lawyer can figure that out, and I can figure that out, and you can figure that out, and your neighbor can figure that out, and we can each be jurors, and even your literate children can figure that out, is it not obvious that jurors can figure out that grade school concept of reasoning expressed in plain English? Well? Why create a rule that violates the higher law of freedom of speech, when the simple process of expressed reasoning leaves no need for such an illogical rule?
But the rule created more power among dishonest lawyers, judges and government chaps. They defied the reasoning to arrive at a conclusion that advanced their power above reasoning. Reasoning cannot create power, but the power to impose a limine to silence reasoning creates more power, used for more than just the first excuse to create it.
Then the government kids, whose minds were already rendered by their titles as incapable of understanding the concept of reasoning, who cannot figure out what every common-sense human can figure out, offer the next in a series of excuses to create their power above reasoning. The first excuse for a limime in a condemnation case often relates to the fact that even with the knowledge that the higher offer was only to avoid the court battle, the jurors tend to run the price up, as though the higher offered price were the determinant, and not the general public disdain for the fundamentally flawed concept of government using power and consistently dishonest lawyers instead of reasoning to seize private property against the will of the owner.
But each of the excuses can be discussed in court, for their validity or flaws, as data for the jurors to make a fully informed decision based on reasoning, rather than on the ignorance created by the government chaps using power of back room rules to hide data from inherently equal human minds charged with the duty to consider all the data and make the final decision.
The limime is so saturated in abject dishonesty, that the limine rule apparently defines as a crime any mention to the jury that a limine was imposed. The law must be hidden from the people subjected to the effects of the law. You cannot even legally tell the jury that you cannot introduce your case to defend yourself against the government or the court because of a limine. The law must remain secret, while secret laws are null and void under the common law, while they are being imposed with raw power of office. The minds of lawyers, judges and other government sorts cannot figure out that anything is wrong with that, literally, even if they read these words and you hand them a dictionary, as the actions of those sorts will continue to prove. They must hide their dishonest source for their dishonest actions because their minds are always vulnerable to truth. They are that intellectually incapacitated. You do not want that to happen to your mind, or you will end up like Russell Gilbert and Heather Van Nuys. They do not recover their minds when they walk out of the court room.
Keep in mind the material wealth at play in this example. This is for how little power-damaged sorts will sell the value of their mind and their integrity on public record. The wealthy Mary Place, Robert Hackett and their government ilk are seizing an approximately 40 foot by 40 foot piece of vacant old industrial area land, and forcing a person who lives at the poverty level to pay the Yakima City Council's wealthy lawyer for the process to take the land. Everything derogatory you say about those abusive foreign dictatorships is manifested right here in American, illuminated in Yakima Washington.
Your goal is to learn that all the rhetorical illusions fabricated by self-fooled minds are not the controlling concept. The controlling concept for this phenomenon is that the power-damaged mind is equally identical and insatiable among all humans, regardless of who falls victim to the craving for power wherever in the world. The poor person in this case may lose the land and his money to the wealthy, greedy Yakima City government sorts, but his mind is able to ask and answer the questions at this website. Who would you rather be? Answer the question. Are you human, and therefore of your mind? Would you sell the utility of your mind for a 40 by 40 piece of dirt and a few thousand dollars? John Puccinelli, Larry Mattson and countless of their government ilk throughout human history have done so, and therefore cannot understand anything at this website.
The reaction of the Yakima government sorts is to fabricate all manner of rhetorical illusions to deny or ignore the logical conclusion from the data. All the worst dictators in human history would praise American court judges for devising the rhetorical limine scam to replace human rights with the raw power of malicious minds which stumble into court judge jobs. They are the products of the same type criminal minds which stumble into American law school professor jobs. Their minds hold an immutable imperative to replace reasoning with raw power.
Now notice, because this discussion is to advance your knowledge, that the next excuses to support the first excuse, illuminate an array of other uses for the original rule, to prevent those jurors from learning what does not support the power of the government rule-writers. Add to that fact, that the rules are being written in back rooms by people who hold positions of power, who are not subject to being fired for writing abusive rules. The public has no functional control over the lawyers writing of the Rules of the Court, within our governmental system, and those rules have now replaced the US Constitution. The rules were written to protect the rule writers from any control or accountability outside their own institution. The Rules of the Court are the rules of the Court, not of the legislature or executive branch. With the separation of powers among the three branches of government, the Rules of the Court block your reaching them to change them from outside, and they protect the power of the lawyers and judges above the rights of the citizens. Each level and agency of government creates and devises its defenses against the others. The universal commonality among all the diverse people in all those government agencies, is the individual craving for power. That power will destroy your rights to advance power is only the by-product. Power will destroy your mind's reasoning ability to advance power.
If you were the wealthiest person in the world, and had to surrender either your wealth or your mind's reasoning ability, which would you surrender, and which has Bernie Sims and Paul George obviously already surrendered for vastly less?
It is not the original contradiction that is obvious for any result. It is the labyrinth of contradictions created by the first one in this case, exponentially expanding so fast and to such complexity in back rooms not subject to public accountability, that no process within them can correct them. They are now the rules imposed as law. If you question them, you can be forced by those rules to pay money as a penalty for questioning them, and thrown in jail if you do not pay, if not thrown in jail anyway, which is why lawyers and judges wrote the rules to create their raw power above the law.
Keep reading, because the poor pitiable victims of their own power are vastly more vulnerable than you recognize, if you ask yourself the questions that their minds cannot allow them to ask themselves.
From the first excuse they used to prevent their having to think enough to reason-through their first flaw, in front of the jury or even among themselves, the insatiable power in their minds caused them to write the rule so that it allowed the extension of itself to disallow a property owner from discussing ANY of his case in a court of law. There was no demarcation between the original contradiction and all the contradictions predicated on it, even to an obviously illogical extreme. Remember this paragraph for EXAMPLE 2, below. The original contradiction was easily resolved with reasoning, but once defended with another contradiction, the resulting spiral held no logic-based demarcation to prevent the results from even replacing the US Constitution.
Amusingly, and highlighting how horribly embarrassing a power-damaged mind becomes, the property owner in this case had no intent or reason to mention the slightly higher price the City Council members offered to avoid a court battle. The property owner was not seeking a higher price. The property owner was not greedy, and was seeking what the condemnation common law and original court process was designed to achieve, that is, only the fair market value determined by a fully informed willing buyer and willing seller. The property owner stated that price might logically be lower than the City's original offer. The property owner did not bring to court any experts to say the property was worth more that the City offered. The determinant was that of revealing all the information about the property, precisely what you and everyone else would want to know before you bought property. That is precisely what the court process was originally designed to reveal, before lawyers and judges corrupted it for their own petty power. The licensed appraiser used by the City could offer a fair valuation of the property, if he was allowed to consider the information that any buyer would want to know about the property. But that information was not allowed to be revealed.
Judge Robert Hackett, lawyer Russell Gilbert, City Council member Paul George and their ilk could read the above paragraph dozens of times, and they cannot understand a word of it, as proven by their ongoing actions of public record. Their actions or public record expose any lies they may attempt to deny these words. They imposed the limine. That is how embarrassingly incapable their minds have become.
The government boys and girls, their lawyers and judges were categorically clueless of the concept of plain old down on the farm honesty represented by the property owner in this case. The government kids only know greed and dishonesty. They only understood the concept of their attempting to cheat the property owner, and facing always-greedy lawyers of the same government ilk asking for more money regardless of the facts. That is all power-damaged minds can understand, least they would not be so damaged. They did not know how to respond in court to the same honest person they faced before the Council members maliciously initiated the costly court process.
Highlighting how far the self-damaged minds of those kids have corrupted the court process, what they primarily sought to hide from the jury by imposing the limime under an array of additional threats, was that the property owner was simply asking that the City Council kids agree to obey law. Government minds fear the law infinitely more than private enterprise criminals fear the law, because the government boys are now consistently violating every law in the book that limits the otherwise maliciously wielded power of government kids. They even violate the law that defines freedom of speech, to thus deny jurors the knowledge that the property owner in this case was asking that the Yakima City Council members to agree to obey the law. That is the extreme they have reached, much to the robust laughter of common-sense humans.
Yakima City Council members were so afraid that Yakima residents might discover that someone asked the Council members to agree to obey the law as a part of a property seizure, that they openly violated a citizen's right to free speech, and maliciously attacked that person with costly court process, to hide that fact from Yakima jurors. It is absolutely impossible for their mind to recognize that they gained nothing compared to their having paid their mind's ability to recognize how they make fools of themselves in public. By attempting to hide that simple truth from twelve Yakima residents on a jury, a truth otherwise easily accommodated, thousands of Yakima residents, including those twelve, among more people around the nation and world, will read that simple truth, plus recognize the intellectual inability of six Yakima City Council members. They are, John Puccinelli, Clarence C. Barnett, Larry Mattson, Mary Place, Bernard J. Sims and Paul George, as well as their lawyers, staff and local judges. They do not understand that inherently curious people, including some of their own children, and many people in Yakima, are on the internet where limimes cannot silence truth. They concurrently identified Yakima Washington as a place with a third world style dictatorship with pocket court judges. Intelligent people, especially investors, will wisely avoid Yakima.
Whatever scant number of dollars or anything else they thought they could temporarily scam, at cost of much more money for unnecessary court process, before higher court judges would protect their personal integrity and intelligence from association with that nadir of thinking-ability, is of zero value compared to what the Yakima City Council members proved of their void of integrity and thinking ability.
Sound reasoning created by fully revealed information does not advance the power of title holders, so the above mentioned excuses were used by the lawyers and judges to write the rules against expressing information. That process first identified the intellectual absence of the rule writers who thus denied their own minds the knowledge that thus became a crime to express. Then the results identified the same void of intellectual ability among the Yakima Valley jurors who asked no questions even when they considered a trial in which obviously only the government was allowed to present its case while the property owner was not allowed to present his case.
Ten out of the twelve jurors mindlessly found in favor of the obviously dishonest Council members, lawyer and judge. Only two Yakima Valley minds out of twelve could figure out that something was wrong with hearing only one side in a court case before being instructed to return a verdict. You do not want that to happen to your mind, and in the Yakima Valley, ten out of twelve of the adults around you cannot understand these words even if you give them a dictionary, as they proved in this case.
Power can only advance on the ignorance of the power-holder and those around them. The choice to remain ignorant, by asking no questions, is yours. That was the choice made by the Yakima City Council members, their lawyers and their judges, who are too ignorant to answer the questions in this website. They chose to keep their otherwise infinitely valuable mind ignorant for the worthless benefits of petty power. How much money and property can they seize to replace the value of their mind? Well? For how much money would you trade the value of your mind? What can you do with money and property, if your mind remains so perpetually confused that you keep doing laughably illogical things among commonly intelligent people around you? Ridicule of government sorts and those who support them is universal among common-sense people, for reason.
When the City Council members, their lawyers and judges speak, they do not perceive themselves as lying. They genuinely believe their words. Their minds are that incapable of even grade school level reasoning. If you are in grade school, protect your mind. Do not let your mind become what those titled and credentialed adults did to their mind.
They can mouth every arrangement of words their mind can concoct to deny these words, and when they are exhausted, their mind still genuinely believes that the controlling concept of written law is that you must do whatever they say at any particular moment because they hold the official titles that they think mean you must do whatever they say at any particular moment regardless of any written law. The proof is in their actions and words. You can say the words, freedom of speech. And they will say the word, limine, then impose it. Which law were you taught in school, freedom of speech, or limine? In what language and dictionary will you find limine? Turn to the children of Yakima City Council members, their lawyers and judges, and ask them if their parents told them about freedom of speech, or about limine? Turn back to the therefore confused minds of the Yakima City Council members, their lawyers and judges, who cannot figure out the contradiction you just identified in their mind, and the lies they told their children.
Their highest intellectual achievement is their sincere belief that their power of office prevails above the reasoning that created the prevailing laws. Armed criminals and soldiers trained their minds to sincerely believe that their guns prevail above any reasoning among humans. They have replaced the value of their mind with a gun, just as the City Council members and judges have replaced it with a title backed by the gun of a guy with a police title. They are dependent upon the gun and such forms of force. They cannot recognize what human reasoning is by its own ability within a human mind, even for the vast majority of cases where no force opposes reasoning. The property owner in this case sought to provide what the Yakima City Council members wanted, so the Council members attacked the property owner, and still cannot recognize any contradiction in their action, even if they read these words.
If their minds ever accessed the reasoning process, all their institutional illusions of force and power would collapse. Why, with an actual answer for public record, did the City Council members, their lawyers and judges use a Latin word they refused to define, to prevent the property owner from presenting the reasoning of his case in a court of law? Why? They cannot answer that simple question answered herein, while they sincerely believe that their government titles mean that they are somehow capable of higher reasoning than people who can easily answer the question.
Do not let your priceless mind become such a ludicrous joke. Their minds are literally damaged beyond repair. Not one of them can state the verifiable answer in public, even after the answer is openly proven and recognized by every commonly intelligent person. Power permanently damages the human mind's process, least power could not exist as a concept in the otherwise reasoning-based human mind.
Why do you not fear to agree to obey the law, but government sorts so fear even the suggestion, that they will squander tax money and violate human rights to evade the suggestion? Do not let your mind become so fearful of honesty.
The writer of these words occasionally describes those fine government folks as intellectually absent, as a substitute for the more common descriptions used by common-sense Yakima Valley farmers. Common-sense farmers routinely reference lawyers, judges, City Council members and other government sorts making typical government decisions, as flat dumb as a post, if not so plain stupid that a post appears to be intellectually interactive. There is just no accounting for the plain words honest people use to describe something as dumb as a post, as something as dumb as a post. Who are more often correct, the common-sense farmers, or the lawyers and government folks? Why are lawyers and government folks universally ridiculed around the world that throughout history? Are common-sense farmers who produce the food you eat universally ridiculed? Why do lawyers and government sorts even ridicule each other across political boundaries and within them? Are their decisions not obviously illogical a vast majority of the time? Do they not attempt to use force, while the farmers do not attempt to force you to eat the food they offer? Utilize your own mind's answers to questions. Your answers are more accurate than mine, unless I can ask a question that causes your mind to identify a contradiction in your answers.
All the fun rhetorical devices to describe people who make decisions that defy logic and the data used for the decisions, the people who create and defend rather than resolve contradictions, are just fun rhetorical devices. Your goal is to recognize a conclusion that defies the data used for the conclusion, as contradicted and thus not logical and thus yet in need of resolving. The person making that contradicted conclusion may be referenced as illogical, ignorant, stupid, intellectually absent, dumb as a post, and all those other things I have been rightfully called for my illogical conclusions hopefully only in the past, but the impartial description is that of a human mind not yet synthesizing all the data to arrive at a verifiable, logical conclusion. A power-damaged mind will never be able to recognize a logical conclusion for data involved with its power. Do not let that happen to your mind. It is a permanent damage.
Do not become so intellectually absent as lawyers and government sorts. If a government rule or anything else creates a contradiction, real or perceived, start asking the questions until you reach the original contradiction, which could have been created by your own mind, and correct that contradiction right then, for every subsequent decision. If you do not do that, and instead leave the contradiction in place, it will flaw every subsequent decision built on it, and other decisions because you will have trained your mind to not resolve contradictions when you recognize them. You will end up like Robert Hackett, Russell Gilbert, Clarence Barnett and that post, genuinely and sincerely believing that human minds should be kept ignorant of information for the decisions they must make.
The property owner logically sought to convey to the city of Yakima the property the City Council members wanted, in the least expensive manner, with the law being obeyed. Notice the logical decision of the property owner, just as you and any other common-sense person would make.
In contrast, the City Council members, their lawyer and judges sought to express their power over the property owner by imposing an illogical and damaging decision, and get away with it in violation of several laws. Their power-damaged minds held the imperative to attack and damage the other guy to express power over reasoning, and did not care who else was harmed, such as the taxpayers. The expression of raw power was the only product of their decision which contradicted common sense, logic, and violated the common law. Notice that the minds of Mary Place, Russell Gilbert and their lot literally cannot understand this paragraph, and will make those type of illogical, damaging decisions the rest of their lifes. Notice the same mental decision process, with only a magnitude difference, when the Saudis few jet airliners into the world trade towers, albeit with the courage to pay their lives, and George Bush therefore bombed innocent Afghan villagers to express raw power over the reasoning process. The magnitude and example differences are merely circumstances surrounding the identical mental decision process to effect an illogical conclusion from the existing data. Do not let that happen to your mind. Notice the same result in the next example.
Example 2: My dear friends in the National Park Service
How could such a diverse situation create the same result in the human mind?
Consider a common human mind, like yours, mine and everyone else's, obviously of the same original design. How would it make a decision that sounds logical to most people, and then use that decision for a resulting process that creates a concluding decision so ludicrous that everyone else around that mind openly ridicules the decision and the person who made it, while that person literally cannot recognize why people are laughing at him? How? What is the process?
You do not want to be that person. It is not important that people not laugh at you. We all make dumb mistakes from lack of information. What is important is that your mind does not end up so thoroughly confused and ignorant of the human phenomenon that your resulting illogical decisions consistently harm other people and your own opportunities in life, while you can never understand the contradictions even when someone patiently explains them to you, and everyone else can understand them. You do not want your mind to end up like the minds of the Yakima City Council members and National Park rangers.
How did a limine start, and how do it end up? Was it not human minds which therein defined the American system of courts and judges as the dumbing down of America? Notice the commonality with the US National Park Service boys, and all institutional impacts on human minds.
Whatever you think of the National Parks, they are popular places to visit. When people visit places, they need hotels, gas stations, cafes and such facilities development. That was easy in the early days before humans got a little carried away with the breeding process. Soon enough there was enough demand for hotels and such facilities development that the parks would become cities if the demand was met. If you want the parks rather than more cities, a limit on the hotels in parks would seem like a logical decision to you and I.
At one point along the way the boys with the highly lucrative hotels already established inside the parks decided a law was needed to exclude any new hotels, to save the wilderness, and increase the room prices for the hotels inside the parks. That seems rather logical, albeit creating a new contradiction that could have instead been solved.
So the boys in Washington DC, ever mindful of the size of their pockets, passed Public Law 89-249, stating that when facilities development created crowding in a National Park, a limited concession permit system would be imposed so that only the insiders could be there, and everyone else would be outsiders. Insiders paid off politicians and Park Superintendents to get the subjectively awarded, highly lucrative permits to operate inside the parks, and the outsiders built their hotels and cafes outside the park entrance gate.
So why do you think the writer of these words was arrested, shackled, chained, finger printed, photographed, ascribed to a criminal record, strip searched, jailed for a week, put in a cell with an accused murderer, denied bail, denied a trial, declared guilty on record, denied an appeal, and more, simply because he walked into a National Park entrance ranger station, stated his name, and politely asked if he could register to climb a mountain in the park. The writer is a mountain climber. The event was witnessed and tape recorded.
Within that and the resulting process involving different times and places, among the best comedies ever produced in this nation, a television camera woman was physically shoved into an elevator, by burley Federal courthouse security thugs, on order of a woman security supervisor, to prevent the camera woman from filming the mountain climber willingly and respectfully surrendering to Federal Marshals as ordered by Federal Marshals. If a movie of the story were made, those who can understand the words at this website would end up rolling on the floor, kicking and pounding, clutching their aching sides, tears of howling laughter streaming from their eyes. The Keystone Cops were pikers compared to the modern US Government Police. Of course Mary Place and Heather Van Nuys would not laugh. They would be confused and enraged that a mere peasant mountain climber would dare to politely question the maliciousness of Paul George and John Hackett's fellow government ilk in the prestigious and honorable government that is here to help you.
The reason the limine law was hidden from the jury who were denied by the limine law the information they needed for a logical decision, under threat of penalty in the limine law, is the same reason the US Court thugs maliciously assaulted the TV camera woman to hide the simple truth of a person respectfully surrendering to the government thugs as ordered, in a public place, a hallway security station, lawfully open to TV cameras. Like the limine boys Gilbert and Hackett, the US court boys Duke and Masengail, referenced a court rule that disallowed TV cameras in court rooms during trials, and imposed it beyond its legal limits, out in a public hallway while no trial was in session in the entire building. Power will never stop at its limits described in law. Power is insatiable. Do not let your mind end up like Gilbert and Duke.
While government boys are powerful, their minds are so vulnerable to questions and public accountability, that is, too ignorant to understand the reasoning process, that burley courthouse security thugs will maliciously shove a television camera woman (criminal assault) back onto an elevator to prevent public exposure of a simple public process involving a citizen capable and known to ask effective questions of government contradictions at any moment. Every non-government citizen reading these words can easily answer such simple, logical questions of glaring government contradictions, but not government minds who were trained to never question orders and thus remain ignorant of how to ask questions. Notice the similarity of Washington State Superior Court Judge Robert Hackett threatening Doug Buchanan with assault in court if he even breathed a word of the law in a court of law. Power-damaged minds cannot tolerate truth.
If a person maliciously shoved Judge Heather Van Nuys in the same manner, or threatened Judge Robert Hackett with the words he used, that person would be imprisoned. But the minds of both judges genuinely cannot recognize the contradiction even if they read these words. They will continue to threaten other people with assault for exercising harmless rights, and their court security thugs will continue to assault people for daring to do the same. The government folks genuinely believe that their titles of raw power, not any reasoning process of the human mind, define right and wrong for the rule of law.
Public Law 89-249, the National Park Service concession permit law, is used like a limine and all other inferior laws violating superior laws, to an inherent extreme in a government of human minds that have become so corrupted they could not recognize the word corruption if you handed them a dictionary.
Lacking enough crowds and hotels to limit with their new law based on creating highly lucrative monopolies with limited permits funneling big bucks into a few government pockets, the Park Service boys imposed their new permit system even on mountain climbers, of all sorts. If you want to climb an inherently dangerous mountain in a National Park, and you are not an experienced climber, and you therefore decide to hire a guide for your safety, while your mind focuses on the logical aspects of this sentence, the Park Service boys focus on the reference to a National Park, the source of their power above reasoning.
The mountain climbing guides do not build facilities in National Parks because their activity does not warrant facilities, and they attract a fraction of a percent of park visitors, therefore creating no crowding by even the most strained rhetorical illusions. Therefore Public Law 89-249 does not and cannot lawfully apply. But a limine does not apply to preventing a property owner from stating that he asked the Yakima City Council members to agree to obey the law.
So in violation of the law, Park Superintendents have put mountain climbing guides in various National Parks under concession permits that limit the number of thus lucrative permits held by political insiders. The Park Service's crony permit holders pay money and political support to the National Park Service, on demand, and thus get to rake the profits from the actual climbing guides who must work under the permits or be arrested. The action fits the definition of a highly lucrative, ongoing criminal racketeering operation carried out by certain National Park Superintendents. Their action is a felony crime, just like Judge Van Nuys' fraudulent switch of laws in court, Judge Hackett's threats and evasions of revealing the law, etcetera. But there are no police to arrest the police who break the law, no prosecutors to prosecute the prosecutors who break the law, no judges to indict the judges who break the law. You do not live under the rule of law. In the United States live under the rule of ignorant, malicious, petty little kings with titles of office. The rest of the world recognizes that more than the US folks who were raised in a society taught to never actually question authority.
The details of the Park Service scam are amusing and typical. Because any court case for guiding mountain climbers without a concession permit would easily result in the criminal use of Public Law 89-249 being exposed in court, the guides who are arrested are prosecuted under a separate inferior law that requires a different permit for any business operation. It is the law-substitution scam used by Heather Van Nuys, Robert Hackett and the entire institution of court judges in this nation. It is the source of their power. The corrupted judges simply refuse to allow discussion of the difference. They impose an inferior law above the superior law, if you can imagine such a thing. The process is so common that National Park rangers routinely reference federal district court judges as their pocket judges, just as Russell Gilbert said that Robert Hackett and Heather Van Nuys would do as he dictated in court, and proved it.
The process is just a small part of a greater scam inherently built on entrenched corruption. With the same-pay-source court judges in their pockets, by simple corruption, just as the Yakima City Council members have achieved for its scams, the Park Service uses taxation by fraudulent citation to generate millions of dollars of revenue each year. They know that most victims issued the fraudulent citations merely pay the 50 to 400 dollar fines rather than hire a 2,000 dollar lawyer to fight the fraudulent citations. And if anyone dares to respectfully question the scam, the court judges use an array of other inferior laws, such as limimes, to punish them for daring to question the government.
To feed that Park Service scam, every year thousands of young college educated outdoor recreationalists, among others, who have harmed nothing and no one are issued fraudulent citations, and thus learn that the American government, police and court personnel are corrupt, dishonest and malicious to the core of their soul. The government personnel, who are selected from among those who ask no questions, and only say, yes sir, to thus remain amusingly ignorant, recognize only the short term money and power they derive. And after all, they are protecting the environment from these humans who want to destroy the world, as they are told by their superiors who were never sufficiently intelligent to question their superiors who parroted the same rhetorical illusion. Their minds cannot understand any of the words at this website. Which situation would you choose? Would you prefer to pay the $300 fine and be able to recognize the contradictions in the taxation by fraudulent citation scam, or get the $300 and never be able to recognize the contradiction? What is the value of your mind's ability?
The issue is not government and court corruption. That corruption will be greater tomorrow for the same reason the Yakima City Council members and their local judges can trammel the rights of whomever they wish, at whim. The issue is your ability to recognize contradictions, and your willingness to write the questions that train your mind to effect the human mind's reasoning process that Yakima City Council members Clarence Barnett, Larry Mattson and those who believe them rather than ridicule them, will never understand the rest of their lives. How did a minor contradiction grow to such proportions of abject illogicality among humans, and how did a sector of those humans train their mind to not recognize even the extremes of illogicality?
The entrenched mountaineering guide concession permit holder for Mt. Rainier National Park in Washington has killed more clients than any other mountaineering guide in the nation, but he is a Park Service political insider. He can carelessly kill whoever he wants, and his permit is secure. Proven safe guides are not allowed to guide in the park. That is just a dramatic example of the other costly contradictions. The 900 dollar Air Force toilet seats are still being purchased, and the non-climbing mountaineering guides are still being given permits by the same type of intellectually absent chaps representing the government and courts in Yakima. Logic, reasoning and accurate data analysis cannot be produced by the power-damaged human mind that will always buy the 900 dollar toilet seats, select the most deadly guide, and deny a jury the knowledge they need to make a logical decision. You do not want that to happen to your mind. The people who will always display such an intellectual void, never thought that would happen to their mind, before it did, and then they could not recognize the results, least such things would not happen.
In Denali National Park in Alaska, where climbing accidents and deaths on Denali are common, except for one token Alaskan who helped the Park Service politically attack the other Alaskan guides, the mountain climbing guide permit holders are not Alaskans. They are summer visitors who have difficulty distinguishing between a mountain and a moose. The Alaskan mountaineering guides were denied permits. They did not have the big bucks to pay off the Park Service boys. If you want any of the highly experienced, year-around Alaskan mountain climbers to guide you, you and they must risk arrest by operating under secrecy in the thriving black market for safe and knowledgeable mountaineering guides.
Remember, the law was for hotels, as stated within the law, but then applied to mountain climbers, then even to outlawing Alaskan mountaineering guides in Alaska. And the Park Service rangers cannot recognize a contradiction even if they read these words. Their minds do not know how to ask questions.
All the Park Service permit guides will tell you how good they are. So why are the Alaskan mountaineering guides with more climbing experience and more Alaskan experience not be allowed to compete against them in an open market? There is nothing that the permit guides can say that prevails over the outlawing of the Alaskan guides in Alaska. The US National Park Service system is identical to the old failed Soviet system, and not one Park Service employee in the nation can recognize a contradiction that they are not supporting with the resulting identification of their intellectual void.
The mountaineering concession guide system is a profit-raking scam. The permit holders sit at desks, pay the Park Service money and political support in Congress, and rake the profits from the actual guides on the mountains. The only limit is on the number of therefore highly lucrative permits. The limit is an arbitrary decree by each Park Superintendent. There is no limit on the number of guides or climbers. So why can't each of the actual guides be given their own permit so they can work for themselves rather than have their profits raked by the few official permit holders, some of them lawyers? Nothing in the law prevents the permits being given to the actual guides. But you can be jailed by Park police and their pocket judges if you ask that question in an effective forum, as proven, and by the same process the Soviet dissidents were sent to the gulags for asking questions about Soviet government corruption, the same process used by Judge Robert Hackett in Yakima to prevent a property owner from presenting his case to defend himself in a court of law.
If your school teacher tells you that this nation is under the rule of written law limited by the US Constitution, rightfully laugh at her. She never learned how to ask the simple questions which expose that amusing lie still being pandered to unquestioning school children in this nation. The dumbing down of America is America's highest achievement. The minds of Russell Gilbert, Robert Hackett, and John Puccinelli are even more ignorant. Their minds are dependent upon never recognizing the flaw of what they are doing.
The minds of young twenty-year old National Park Rangers literally cannot recognize the dishonest and damaging contradictions they are creating and supporting. They will grow up to be the lawyers, City Council members, court judges, Park Superintendents and other government chaps who never learned how to simply ask questions when contradictions were revealed. Do not let that happen to your priceless mind.
The mountain climber who was arrested in this example had prior asked a series of effective questions that proved on record extensive criminal actions of several Park Superintendents, so he was jailed for asking questions. He enjoyed jail for a week, where most of the inmates, including the accused murderer, were vastly more honorable than the people who put them there, just like in the old Soviet gulags. He can write and understand the concepts on this website, as well as far more complex concepts, while the people who put him in jail sincerely believe that law is whatever any government chap says is law, even if the chaps says opposite things on different days because politically different people are doing the same thing, even if the contradictions become so extreme that every common-sense person openly ridicules the government chap.
So what will those six Yakima City Council members, their staff, lawyers and pocket judges do when the questions of their current, malicious violations of the prevailing law become progressively more effective, as they will? The government already put the source of the questions in jail for asking questions, much to his amusement, and trained him to not be too distracted by the bullets zipping past him in Vietnam. How malicious will Clarence Barnett and Dick Zais prove themselves to be, to defend their minds from simple questions revealing the simple truth of their actions, and how much Yakima and Washington tax money will they spend to do that? Their minds hold no escape until their power sacrifices them, because they cannot access reasoning.
It does not matter if the straw man invented to fool you, steal your property and deny your rights is a limime, a permit, a license, a title, an inferior law or any other rhetorical device. You want to recognize that a contradiction was created, and then ask the questions that resolve the contradiction. You do not want to care about the fact that any petty power and petty ego will be destroyed by those questions. You are human. You are of your mind. The knowledge it can create with questions is worth infinitely more than all the power of all the institutions, all the money that can be run through the printing presses, and all the ego that all the testosterone and other hormones can synthesize.
The mountain climbers sought to provide and receive competent mountaineering guide services by local climbers experienced in the unique Alaska mountain environment. Notice the logical decision of the mountain climbers, just as you and any other common-sense person would make.
In contrast, the Park Service boys sought to express their power over the mountain climbers by imposing an illogical and damaging decision, and get away with it in violation of several laws. Their power-damaged minds held the imperative to attack and damage the other guy to express power over reasoning, and did not care who else was harmed, such as the taxpayers who paid for the denial of their access to competent Alaskan mountaineering guides. The expression of raw power was the only product of their decision which contradicted common sense, logic, and violated the common law. Notice that the minds of National Park Service personnel literally cannot understand this paragraph, and will make those type of illogical, damaging decisions the rest of their lifes. Notice the same mental decision process, with only a magnitude difference, when the Saudis few jet airliners into the world trade towers, albeit with the courage to pay their lives, and George Bush therefore bombed innocent Afghan villagers to express raw power over the reasoning process. The magnitude and example differences are merely circumstances surrounding the identical mental decision process to effect an illogical conclusion from the existing data. Do not let that happen to your mind.
Conclusion:
It is not of any consequence that the confused minds of Russell Gilbert, Robert Hackett, Mary Place, John Puccinelli, Bernie Sims, Clinton, Bush, Osama, Saddam and their ilk feel safe because they know how few people will read words of this nature, and how rare such words are. Their intellectually absent ilk will be maliciously trammeling their fellow humans, and thus stagnating humans, including themselves, as long as the concept of power frolics in the minds of its victims. And their children, raised within the rhetorical illusions of that ilk, will learn only the same illogical concept of wielding the power of guns above reasoning, thus creating the next wave of maliciousness among humans, on schedule. There is no escape in any of the power-based institutions. If you think school teachers can think outside that fundamentally flawed cocoon, suggest that people should not be forced to pay taxes to reward and thus perpetuate the horribly failing school system in this nation and world. Why do wars and prisons still exist when all the governments and other institution leaders say they advocate the use of reasoning rather than the use of power? Well? They do not recognize the contradiction between their words and actions, and do not know what questions to therefore ask. Why do Park Service officials still give permits to the most dangerous, unquestioning and ignorant mountaineering guides, and outlaw the safe, knowledgeable guides, under the usual rhetorical lies? And why do Yakima City Council members maliciously attack anyone who asks them to obey the law? Why? You should be able to answer those questions, and defend your answers against every question, to thereupon identify the accurate answers.
What is of consequence is that those of you who did read this far, and asked the questions that caused your mind to understand the substance of what you read, have obviously derived knowledge of value infinitely beyond the comprehension of the victims of power. As only an aside you therein understand the comedy of power-damaged minds, and laugh robustly at them, enjoying life far beyond those poor sad pitiable victims of their own power.
You want your mind to be able to recognize every contradiction, and openly write words of truth. You want to be able to ask questions, even when the usual government thugs in this nation threaten you with jail or seizure of assets, for asking. You want to not fear answering questions, even if they destroy any power to thus advance your knowledge. The minds of government folks are not sufficiently intelligent to do that. You want to be able to laugh when government folks get so huffy about their titles and power that they steal your property and money, and throw you in jail if you dare to ask questions when they get huffy about their petty power. Government folks cannot do that. You want to recognize that the problem is not just that of Russell Gilbert, Paul George and their ilk, but is created by any mind which acquires power or does not ask questions. It could happen to your mind, and you must protect it from such damage caused by self-induced ignorance. The damage that power does to a human mind is permanent. Russ and Paul will never regain the command of logic. You may watch their public actions the rest of their lives, for the proof.
Openly ask the questions, on public record, that cause the government drones to put you in jail and otherwise trammel your rights. That is an inconsequential cost for advancing your mind vastly beyond the government nadir defined by Yakima City Council members Mary Place, John Puccinelli and their ilk, lawyer Russell Gilbert, Judge Robert Hackett and their ilk, National Park Service rangers and other such pitiable victims of their own power. You must work your mind to learn the knowledge that is so feared by the vulnerable government minds that they invented weapons, prisons and inferior laws to attack anyone who thinks, throughout human history. Your individual mind is worth more than all the power and titles humans have ever invented, as you will quickly recognize if you use your mind instead of power and titles.
I wish you the best in all things.
DougBuchanan.com